Skip to main content

The Realistic Thinking of the Left

I saw a Jacobin article recently that summarized the thinking of the left. It basically said: when people ask us where we will get the money to pay for Medicare for All and more social programs, they are just trying to distract us and demoralize us. The important thing is to win power and then we will deal with those questions later. These leftists don't want to ask about what the power consists in and what it's used for. They don't want to ask why so many people are completely destroyed and unable to afford basic healthcare. They don't want to ask what kind of economy needs massive social programs (hint: one that presupposes massive poverty). They don't want to clarify anything about the state and its basis. They don't want to think about the blackmail power of the capitalists that the whole system is based on. It's just like: "we will tax the hell out of them!" But then you have to ask: what will you do so that they invest? Without investment, no jobs and no tax revenue. And isn't the whole way work is organized the very basis upon which the power of the capitalist class is based on? Isn't that the reason for the ever-decried wealth disparities? If you just ask these very basic questions, which are well-known to any business student moron, they will freak out. For them, this is just a moral question. They think these questions just reveals some conservative ideology, and has nothing to do with the real interests of capitalists. It would seem the obvious answer would be to take away the power of extortion of the capitalists and to reorganize the economy so it becomes about meeting needs and not the profit interests of business. Instead these leftists have this fantasy of using the state and economy for good because they are so realistic and don't want to get too far away from the "possible". One is tempted to raise again the old Situationist slogan -- one of the few they had that made any sense -- against the myopic pragmatism of the left: "be realistic: demand the impossible!"

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From the world of science (I) The thing about the transition

If  a scientist were to present the following insight as a result of his research: "  Water is for washing  , faleri and falera, and can also be used for brushing teeth; water is needed by the dear livestock, falera and faleri, and the fire brigade also needs water very much... and Hawaii, the South Sea island, would be a dreary palm brush." While his originality might not be questioned, his academic qualifications would certainly be challenged, and even the greatest exam pressure wouldn't prevent students from considering such material banal or nonsense. This is not the case, however, when the same academic expresses similar views about political parties. "It is the political parties that, against this backdrop, make an election decision with alternatives possible in the first place, and thus the core of a democratic process. The parties influence opinion formation and the emergence of the electorate's will with their political concepts and pronouncements; they ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ghost Hunting - On the history of ideas about anti-communism

A rough and dirty translation from an article "Gespensterjagd -- Zur Ideengeschichte des Antikommunismus" from Gruppen Gegen Kapital Und Nation (Groups Against Capital and Nation). Original can be found here: https://gegen-kapital-und-nation.org/gespensterjagd-zur-ideengeschichte-des-antikommunismus/ “A specter is haunting Europe - the specter of communism."“ All the powers of old Europe have united in a holy hunt against this specter,” wrote Marx and Engels in the Communist Manifesto — and that, contrary to other claims in that work, is a pretty true statement. Hatred and fear of radical change in civil society is as old as its revolutionary implementation itself. At the latest with the French Revolution, which did not operate in a religious disguise like the Dutch and English revolutions, and which was much more radical in its theoretical justification than the American one, the fear of the “Red Terror” arose (before “La Grande, by the way. “Terreur” really started in ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Habermas' new book: An unusually reactionary political philosophy

When the German news magazine SPIEGEL recently reported on the shattering of Marxism's most tenacious dogma under the heading "Philosophers" in its "Culture" section, it gleefully quoted a rather unusual bourgeois ideologue. According to SPIEGEL, the "important social philosopher" Jürgen Habermas, in an anthropological examination of the transition from ape to human, discovered that humanity is not redeemed, as Marx believed, by marching off to work in the morning, but rather finds its fulfillment in returning home to its family in the evening: "Karl Marx saw work as a blessing, humanity's path to self-redemption, that which makes a person human. Now Habermas comes along and proclaims something that must disturb the left (not SPIEGEL, however): Not work, but family makes a person human." Thus, SPIEGEL was once again able to make use of the back pages of a man from German science whose life's work, which became known and useful in the ...
Post a Comment
Read more